Video by John-Michael Talboo,
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com
Visibility 9-11 Welcomes Researcher Jim Hoffman…
http://visibility911.com/blog/?p=1351
Core Of Corruption Volume 1: In The Shadows {Full Film}…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_9uB64…
Core Of Corruption: Echoes of Treason – Teaser Trailer, 2nd film in series…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=thdA1M…
“Bandwagon effect, invented by Conal Sherry, also known as “cromo effect” and closely related to opportunism, is the observation that people often do and believe things because many other people do and believe the same things. The effect is often called herd instinct. People tend to follow the crowd without examining the merits of a particular thing. The bandwagon effect is the reason for the bandwagon fallacy’s success.” – SOURCE: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandwago…
“The name “bandwagon fallacy” comes from the phrase “jump on the bandwagon” or “climb on the bandwagon”, a bandwagon being a wagon big enough to hold a band of musicians. In past political campaigns, candidates would ride a bandwagon through town, and people would show support for the candidate by climbing aboard the wagon. The phrase has come to refer to joining a cause because of its popularity.” – SOURCE: http://www.fallacyfiles.org/bandwagn….
“Eyewitness identification evidence is the leading cause of wrongful conviction in the United States. Of the more than 200 people exonerated by way of DNA evidence in the US, over 75% were wrongfully convicted on the basis of erroneous eyewitness identification evidence. In England, the Criminal Law Review Committee, writing in 1971, stated that cases of mistaken identification “constitute by far the greatest cause of actual or possible wrong convictions”. Yet despite substantial anecdotal and scientific support for the proposition that eyewitness testimony is often unreliable, it is held in high regard by jurors in criminal trials, even when “far outweighed by evidence of innocence.” In the words of former US Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan, there is “nothing more convincing [to a jury] than a live human being who takes the stand, points a finger at the defendant, and says ‘That’s the one!’” – SOURCES: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyewitne…
http://innocenceproject.org/understan…
Criminal Law Review Committee Eleventh Report, Cmnd 4991
Elizabeth Loftus, Eyewitness Evidence 9 (1979).
Watkins v. Souders, 449 U.S. 341, 352 (1982) (Brennan, J. dissenting).
The Problem with Eyewitness Testimony
a talk by
Barbara Tversky, Professor of Psychology
and
George Fisher, Professor of Law
Laura Engelhardt
“Courts, lawyers and police officers are now aware of the ability of third parties to introduce false memories to witnesses. For this reason, lawyers closely question witnesses regarding the accuracy of their memories and about any possible “assistance” from others in the formation of their present memories.” – SOURCES: http://agora.stanford.edu/sjls/Issue%…
http://agora.stanford.edu/sjls/Issue%…
Magician Brian Brushwood…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Br…
(5of14) False Memory and Eyewitness Testimony…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bfhIua…
CIT’s Deceptive Flight Path Argument: “North” or “South”? What about “Hit the Pentagon”?…
http://arabesque911.blogspot.com/2009…
Eyewitness Accounts – Eyewitnesses Recalled Explosions, No Alarms or Sprinklers…
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/eyewitnesses.html
Visibility 9-11 Welcomes Kevin Ryan and Dr. Steven E. Jones…
http://www.911blogger.com/node/19762
Fair Use Notice
This video contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.