Nov 25

9/11 Debate: Jon Gold Vs. Pat Curley


Part I

Part II

Part III

All three parts to a debate between 9/11 Activist Jon Gold and Pat Curley the creator of the popular blog ScrewLooseChange.

The debate took place on Monday, November 24th, 2008 on the Franklin Pierce University closed circuit television show, The Dynamic Duo and was moderated by the show’s hosts Justin Martell and Eric Jackman.

The only editing that has been done to the three segments is all references to commercials have been removed (to make the conversation continuous), along with the opening and closing credits. The content of the debate has not been altered in any way.

FP-TV’s The Dynamic Duo is in no way affiliated with the GCN Radio Network show of the same name.

www.FormYourOwn.org

Nov 24

Thanks For Playing…


A lot of people are suggesting that 9/11 Truth is a dead issue. I didn’t hear no bell.

This debate is dedicated to Patty Casazza and Bob McIlvaine.

Nov 18

Debate! Jon Gold Vs. Pat Curley - 11/24/2008 - 6PM EST



Click Here

Topics of Discussion:
1) Are there unanswered questions?
2) Was the 9/11 Commission a legitimate investigation?

Moderators:
Eric Jackman
Justin Martell

It’s going to be on a TV show called “The Dynamic Duo”, and will be broadcast online 11/25/2008.

May 27

Lorie Van Auken, Kyle Hence, And John Judge On Air America’s Clout

Audio
Click Here (Right Mouse Click And Choose “Save As”)

SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT: Joining John and Kyle will be 9/11 Family Member, and “Jersey Girl” Lorie Van Auken who lost her husband Kenneth Van Auken.

This week’s debate on Air America’s “Clout” with Richard Greene is destined to be a special one. As it stands right now, the two confirmed “pro-Truth” guests to appear are Kyle Hence, and John Judge, the founders of 9/11 CitizensWatch. Citizenswatch was a watchdog group of the 9/11 Commission that worked alongside the 9/11 Family Steering Committee. Along with the families, they called for the resignation of Executive Director Philip Zelikow, and at one point, they started an advertising campaign “demanding that Bush, Cheney, Clinton, Gore and Rice testify publicly, and under oath before the commission.” They ran “billboard advertisements in the Washington metro rail system for four weeks, as well as quarter-page ads in The Washington Post.” Thus far the one confirmed guest who does NOT agree that we need another investigation is Daniel Pinchbeck, the author of 2012: The Return of Quetzalcoatl, Tarcher, 2006 and editorial director of the web magazine, Reality Sandwich. Daniel’s position is that we need to move forward, not back.

9/11 CitizensWatch has appeared on C-SPAN:

6/18/2004 (RealPlayer Required)
7/22/2004 (RealPlayer Required)

Kyle Hence is the Executive Producer of “9/11: Press For Truth”, and “In Their Own Words: The Untold Stories Of the 9/11 Families”. John Judge has worked as the Special Projects Assistant to Rep. Cynthia McKinney of Georgia, has been a member of COPA for years, and is writing a critique of the 9/11 Commission Final Report for the 9/11 Research Center.

There are very few people in the world today that understand the problems with the 9/11 Commission as John and Kyle do. Please tell your friends, and family to listen in. As I said, this show is destined to be a special one.

Mar 09

OnTheLineTV Debate: Should We Impeach?

www.onthelinetv.com

The host is Jeff Cobb. The journalist that wrote the story about Betsy and me.

Taped March 7, 2008 This is a complete, unedited debate between Jane Dugdale of Bryn Mawr Pa., and Bruce Bikin of Radnor, Pa. Jane is speaking as a member of Main Line Citizens for Impeachment. Bruce is speaking as the chair of the Radnor Township Democrats. This should be especially interesting because as two Democrats, they are highlighting the views of one grassroots sub-movement within the party (Dugdale), whereas Bikin speaks from a pretty much mainstream party line position. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has said impeachment is “off the table.” There are those in her party who wish to change that. This was taped in Wayne, Pa. at Radnor Studio 21 (www.rs21.org) Purpose: community journalism: get the message out clean and with no spin or ulterior agenda. I wish to inform the people of things that are important to them. That is what journalists are supposed to do. Period. My name is Jeff Cobb. I’m the news editor for Main Line Life newspaper (www.mainlinelife.com) I have 10 years experience in print journalism and am branching into TV, this being my fourth show to date. This program is non-partisan, and I serve as a moderator for topics presented. Further qualification: I have a BA in journalism from Temple University.

Aug 19

The Debate About What Really Happened On 9/11

As I read this, I realized that the person writing it must have spent at least SOME time looking into 9/11. I also realized that the very fact that he calls for a “full, thorough and nonpartisan investigation of the tragedy and the months preceding” shows that someone who probably thought we were nothing but “nuts”, after spending some time looking into 9/11, learned that we are NOT “nuts”, and instead are people asking legitimate questions. Something the “debunkers” would NEVER admit. - Jon

Source: telegram.com

Albert B. Southwick
8/19/2007

National catastrophes tend to spawn conspiracy activists. Abraham Lincoln’s assassination, a seemingly straightforward affair, was chewed over for years by conspiracy buffs who fingered various parties. One theory claimed that the Jesuits did it.

Another found Secretary of War Edwin Stanton guilty of the dastardly deed.

The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941, produced a spate of conspiracy speculations, including the idea that President Franklin D. Roosevelt deliberately allowed it to happen in order to get the United States into the war.

The assassination of President John F. Kennedy resulted in a bumper crop of conspiracy theories, some of which are still bouncing around among the gullible.

Read the rest of this entry »

Jun 12

The Time For Debate Is Over

Jon Gold
12/2/2006

Some of you may or may not have noticed, but I’ve been pushing activism a lot lately. Forming a local 9/11 group, distributing 9/11 flyers in your neighborhood, contacting your local representatives, and of course, your local media.

It has been more than five years since the day of 9/11. So much information has come out that proves beyond the shadow of doubt, we need a new investigation. Period. The end. That should be our focus, and our goal. Representatives of a good portion of family members called for a new investigation, and we should be doing everything in our power to help them get one. I fear that if the 9/11 Truth Movement continues to spend the majority of its’ time debating who, what, when, why, and where, then I feel this movement will eventually become exactly what the New York Times described us as, “Conspiracy Buffs“.

Read the rest of this entry »