You may have heard that Philadelphia Daily News columnist Stu Bykofsky recently wrote that a new 9/11 is what we need in order to re-unify this country.

I think what’s interesting about his assertion is that he is willing to have 1000’s of people murdered because it would be beneficial in his eyes.

How much different is that than what we are saying with regard to the Bush Administration and the first 9/11 (and hopefully the last)? Is it such a stretch to say that the Bush Administration was willing to have 1000’s of people murdered because it was beneficial to them in that it allowed them to invade two countries illegally, it gave them unprecedented powers that go against the Constitution of the United States, it has given billions of dollars to their corporate friends, and it has given them “carte blanche” for policies that do not benefit the people, but instead the Military Industrial Complex? No, it isn’t.

What Stu has shown us is that people ARE capable of looking at an event like 9/11, and seeing it as “beneficial.” What Stu has shown us is that people ARE capable of WANTING something like 9/11 to happen in order to further an agenda.

The Bush Administration are suspects for the crimes of 9/11. Please do not tell me that this isn’t true based on the idea that they would never be able to do such a thing, or even think of such a thing.

I can guarantee you that seeing something like 9/11 as beneficial is not unique to Stu Bykofsky. Not by a longshot.

Source: guardian.co.uk

Dan Glaister in Los Angeles
Monday July 30, 2007
The Guardian

The Bush administration is facing claims that it is fuelling an arms race in the Middle East following the disclosure of a plan to sell $20bn (£9.8bn) of advanced weaponry to Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states.

The plan, which will be announced today, will be balanced by a 25% increase in US military and defence aid to Israel. A further $13bn will be pledged to Egypt.

“This administration does not have an arms sales policy, except to sell, sell, sell,” said Daryl Kimball of the Arms Control Association. “That approach in the Middle East can be like throwing gasoline on a brush fire.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Thanks to www.mediamatters.org

Click Here (MOV)

On 9/12/2006, Paul Thompson appeared on the Randi Rhodes show, and ripped apart “The Path To 9/11″.

Click Here (MP3 7.6MB)

Source: alternet.org

I’m not posting this because of the obvious attempt at making Bill Clinton come off looking rosey. 9/11 Truth is not partisan. I’m posting this because of the ridiculous hypocrisy of being able to “blame” Clinton for the 9/11 attacks, but heaven forbid anyone mention Bush and 9/11. There are many examples of people friendly to the Bush Administration blaming Clinton for the 9/11 attacks. Here’s one from Bill Kristol. Let’s also not forget ABC actually made a movie depicting Clinton as the one to blame. Remember, blaming Clinton for 9/11 good, blaming Bush for 9/11 bad. - Jon
Read the rest of this entry »